From the introduction:

This study set out to revise the usefulness of the governance of moral goods approach for resolving a soil-related conflict. This way leadership concept is explored as a governance approach of “common ground”. Leadership is framed as a search for commonalities knowing that conjuring up global commonalities will not take a conflict further than systematically emphasizing differences. It is vital to understand the threshold of economic differences between leadership stiles by landwoners producing moral goods.

This work focuses on the conflict resulting from spatial trade-offs between management for provisioning ecosystem services, i.e., timber, cattle, soy extraction, and management for regulating ecosystem services, i.e., carbon sequestration and water regulation.